Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Urology ; 209(Supplement 4):e628, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2316930

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The current pandemic has forced the population to experiencing negative psychological reactions and changes in sexual behavior. The aim of our study is to investigate how the sexual health of male and female individuals has changed during the COVID pandemic period. METHOD(S): We conducted a retrospective cohort study with an anonymous survey using the Google Forms platform on a population of individuals of both sexes. Participants were spontaneously enrolled and asked to answer questions regarding their sexual health and habits during the pre-pandemic (T0) and a pandemic (T1) period. Participants were stratified into four age groups: G1 (18-35 yo), G2 (36-50 yo), G3 (51-60 yo), and G4 (61-70 yo). Male and female patients' sexual function was evaluated with IIEF-15 questionnaire and FSFI questionnaire, respectively;both populations responded to the CSFQ- 14 questionnaire. Data were compared between groups reporting the mean standard deviation (SD). Results were compared with the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the mean scores of the questionnaires were analyzed with the Wilcoxon test. RESULT(S): 244 patients, 144 males and 100 females spontaneously participate to the survey. Overall, IIEF-15 score in the general population at T1 were lower than T0 (58.95+/-15.8 vs 62.44+/-11.1, p<0.001). However, considering results divided by age groups, there was a statistically significative difference only in the younger age group (G1: 58.22+/-16.9 vs 63.41+/-9.7, p<0.0001). Regarding the female subjects, the statistical analysis showed that the differences between T0 and T1 were not statistically significative both for the total population (p=0.9) and for the different age groups. Analyzing the single items of FSFI, Q15 (mean 2.77+/-1.6 vs 2.46+/-1.5, p<0.005) and Q16 (mean 2.87+/-1.5 vs 2.46+/-2.4, p<0.0001) that are part of the Satisfaction domain, demonstrated a significative differences between groups. In both gender groups there was no differences in CSFQ-14 at T0 and T1. CONCLUSION(S): During the pandemic period, the male population in our study reported an impairment in the sexual function. However, in female individuals there were no variations in the two periods analyzed. The COVID-19 pandemic has played a role in changing couple dynamics and more research will be necessary to study the effects on the sexual health of the affected population.

2.
European Urology ; 79:S176, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1591467

RESUMEN

Introduction & Objectives: COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected urological activity worldwide. The enhancement of hygienic measures including distancing, restricted access to the ward, reduction in the number of hospitalized patients and use of PPE has potentially reduced the risk of COVID-19 infections. These strategies could simultaneously reduce the risk of nosocomial infections during hospitalization. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of prevention measures against COVID-19 in reducing the incidence of infectious complications during hospitalization. Materials & Methods: In a retrospective observational study, we collecteddata of all patients admitted to two Urological centers: “Santa Croce and Carle” in Cuneo and “Policlinico Paolo Giaccone” in Palermo. We compared the period from February to May 2019 to the corresponding months of 2020. After collecting patients clinical characteristics (age, comorbidities, etc.), we evaluated the days of hospitalization, the number and type of surgical interventions (major, endoscopic - divided into upper and lower tract - and others), the onset of fever or new COVID-19 cases during hospitalization, the number of blood and urine cultures performed and the type of pathogen identified. Data were compared with media-standard deviation (SD) and with unpaired T-test. A value of p <0.05 was considered significant. Discrete data were analysed with contingency analysis. A Chi2 <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 985 patients were included. Comparing 2019 with 2020, there was a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative fever considering all hospitalized patients (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant reduction in post-operative fever incidence after major surgery(p<0.04) and lower tract endoscopic procedures (p<0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in uppertract endoscopic procedures (p<0.99), neither in other minor surgical procedures (p<0.6). The rate of patients with positive blood culture compared to 2019 has decreased significantly (p<0.007), and although statistical significance was not reached, the same trend is observed in the number of patients with positive urine culture (p<0.08). Conclusions: The strong prevention measures implemented during COVID-19 pandemic have led to a general significant decrease in infectious complications acquired during hospitalization. This is more evident in patients undergoing major surgical procedures that require longer hospital stay. The use of some of widely used preventive measures against COVID-19 should therefore be maintained in the hospital environment even at the end of the pandemic situation(e.g. frequent hand washing,reduced access to hospital wards anddistancing between patients in hospital rooms and common spaces).

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA